Why LW band?
As signals are shifted they are
stretched and from 100s or 1000s of
megahertz per second down to 100s of
kilohertz per second and in some cases
even less than this. For example if we
are sending a radio signal on AM band of
800 kHz, after a few light years they
are down to a few hundred Hertz.
Microwave signals are no exceptions.
Before if the length of 800 kHz signal
was 1 second or 300,000Km now the same
signal is longer in length than before,
it is longer by 0.103*Km
per second per light year (See
(if the signal is transmitted from the Equator, see formula).
So if the signal is going to travel a very long distance this
stretching continues and the amount of signals per second will
drop. If before we had 800 kHz/s signals after 100 years travel
we would have relatively less signals per seconds.
Does it only effect to Radio Signals?
No, it has the same effects on light as well
as radio signal.
Does it only effect to transmitting or receiving of radio signals?
The effects start from transmitting, but if you are on the receiving end it would effect you. This means that if a signal is coming from a planet in the far distance and we are trying to receive it, this signal is shifted at a rate that depends on:
1- How far the planet is from us, and
2- How fast the planet is rotating on its axis.
This finding shows that we have never been able to receive any signals from the outer space that we could interpret it or transform it to a form that we can hear or understand. With the way and equipments we are using we will never be able to receive any signals. The only thing that we can receive are very short signals that because of their nature of travel we can translate them into fainted "beeps" and hear them on the radio.
How it happens?
the base of the transmitter is on the move and/or rotating on its axis (like
a planet/the Earth) at a fast rate the signals that are transmitted would be
shifted after they leave our solar system. The amount of
this shift depends on the location of the transmitter from the
equator. On the equator (0°) the Wave-Shift is the maximum amount, by going
farther away from the equator and getting closer to the poles (90°) the
Wave-Shift is reduced and will be zero at the poles. The length of the signal
stays the same, but it is its direction that shifts.
For example if we are
transmitting a 5 minutes of radio signals from somewhere on the equator,
after 1 light year it is still a 5 minutes in length signal but is now
traveling almost sideways and the end of signal is separated from the beginning of
it by about 74,464*Km. (Click
see the wave-shift in 3D.
How it effects the light?
It shifts the light same way as radio signals, see the next page.
Why we still can receive the lights from very distant stars and planets, but
not the radio signals from even 1 light day away?
Wave-Shift starts from distance of 1 LD
or sometimes even less than that. (1 LD,
Light Day is the distance that light
travels in 1 day or 23.93 hours). For
example the Wave-Shift at this point if
the transmitter is located at 33.88°
latitude (Sydney) would be
We are still receiving radio signals but unable to sort them
out and interpret them. We can see light from stars and
planets millions or even billions of light years away because
to see a light it is enough to receive a small fragment of the
signal, that is all needed. But in radio signals we have to
receive the complete length of the signal so we can interpret
We cannot see any stars or planet that is rotating on its axis
in fine details. All we can see is a bright dot and sometimes
with darker spots on them.
Even if we build the most powerful
telescope in the universe, when we look at a planet only 100
light years away we will not be able to see a detailed picture
of the planet, all what we would see is a distorted picture.
This picture would look like a pixilated picture and some would
think with special computer software they can clear these
distortions. There are planets and solar systems millions or
even billions of light years away from us.
Why we see pictures of very far distance objects in space with a very fine details?
The image of a planet
from any distance if not
Images from any distant
planets/stars look very
similar, and blurry due
Because they are not
rotating, objects such as space dust clouds or asteroids are not rotating
therefore are not subject to a "Wave-Shift". The Wave-Shift is applicable to
any rotating objects. The pictures "A & B" present an illustrated version of
Wave-Shift on light arrays and how they effect our vision. On picture "A"
this is Earth if is not rotating or taken picture from a close proximity,
picture "B" presents the planet from a very remote proximity and the planet
On picture "A" we can zoom in our telescope to see more fine details.
On picture "B" no matter how much we can zoom in or how good we can digitally
process the pictures with computers; still we can't make a good picture out
of it. No matter how we adjust our telescopes or how powerful they are, it
seems we cannot see the fine details that we think we should. If with the
state-of the-art computer digitally we sharpen and modify these images we
would create a picture that would make some meaning but is far from the real
This means that from a
blurry image we are creating an image that is not related to the real image
anymore, we have created a totally new image.
image is not just blur, it is made of many layers, when we look at an
object in a close proximity we see one layer for each object, or to put it
in a correct way we see the object made out of many layers that are
constantly projected outwards; all these layers have the same origin and
the same destination.
increase our distance the "Motion Effect" overlays all these layers,
these layers have same origin but different destination. As
you can see in the picture the light signals are shifted and the objects
have become blurred. This shift and blur continues to get grater as the
distance gets grater. From a
considerable distance all planets and stars would appear very similar, just
the bright and darker spots are placed differently.
for details of these figures or see the formula.